• 患者服务: 与癌共舞小助手
  • 微信号: yagw_help22

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

开启左侧

[基础知识] 给ICB免疫减毒增效的 药物(十九)--肌苷、β-葡聚糖

[复制链接]
3416 0 自学自救 发表于 昨天 17:11 |

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册

x
第一部分 肌苷: i1 }: K4 @. ^+ y; ~4 L* u

6 s( m7 C; V1 J , d6 Z/ U6 A+ u# I
《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》 一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验:) ~' l' n' H$ ~: `: o

' E9 L: I5 {- F. v1、入组患者:172名晚期实体瘤患者,分为 ICB免疫治疗+肌苷组和 ICB免疫治疗组不联合肌苷(该组部分患者联合了化疗或者靶向)两组,每组86名患者。
7 L+ E- ~& a+ j) m) ]
6 R; M/ N' O: q2 O/ r; i* Q8 b2、肌苷用法:口服肌苷片,每天三次,每次0.2克。  \1 ~' M. v) T1 g2 v
; R2 P. f5 x' i/ H7 L! L
3、试验结果:肌苷组和非肌苷组中位PFS (95% CI)分别为7.00(5.31-8.69)和4.40(3.10-5.70)个月(风险比[HR]0.63;95%置信区间为0.44–0.90,p= 0.011),肌苷组PFS提高有统计学意义。ORR分别为26.7%和15.1%(p= 0.061),肌苷组ORR有改善。非肌苷组中位OS为29.67个月(95% CI 17.40–41.94),肌苷组中位OS尚未达到。( k1 f1 F2 e6 w, O) ~' z5 B- h1 u

, \; L7 L8 H& B: U( n1 v肌苷组和非肌苷组分别有25名(29%)和31名(36%)患者出现3级和4级不良反应,肌苷组的不良反应趋于减少。
' P! X% G7 [- V- z4 Z* C 7 X* @' s% O% v6 h

; Z( P8 }5 ~4 ]. ]8 O$ M
2 f% u$ t9 b1 Z4 F第二部分 β-葡聚糖  v' I! Y: q/ W% T& h
, h* ^! n- o- H

  J+ _6 a/ U5 i, |" W1 A/ }1 [; _, G《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验,β-葡聚糖+pd-1i 恩沃利 + 抗血管生成药物治疗先前pd-1i治疗失败的非小细胞肺癌。5 M$ @: B% r! f* u! s- A- D# S- H

8 _* c  S9 S/ `/ p! r, q/ r8 c) w1、入组患者:23名晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者之前用pd-1i治疗都已经失败。
2 F$ x2 v, R4 j! C4 r : I. @$ J6 g3 W0 c
2、β-葡聚糖用法:每天两次,每次500毫克。
4 `3 F+ i3 ^& y8 |1 R
7 _9 l% u( y7 C2 \# x" i3、试验结果:ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9%.,PFS 4.3个月,OS 8.9个月。PD-L1阳性和阴性亚组之间的mPFS有显著差异(6.3个月对2.3个月,p = 0.002)。- n( c& {5 k3 }8 q" c+ {
) }( x3 E0 A- ?1 o' u
52.2%的患者发生了治疗相关的不良事件。最常见的原因是甲状腺功能减退(26.1%)和疲劳(26.1%)。报告了2例(8.7%)3级不良事件。未观察到与死亡相关的不良反应。4 ~; q; U7 c. e! t- W
: m  u  D+ n% _$ n5 l( Y, _
蛋白质组学分析显示CASP-8、ARG1、MMP12、CD28和CXCL5的水平与对治疗的抗性相关,而CD40-L和EGF的水平与有利的反应相关。
* L5 N$ L' m) `' }  z8 Z. b
1 c! E4 P  n% {- G# |( b  {+ N(因为患者都是之前用pd-1i都已经失败的患者,所以ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9% 还是很不错的)
7 ^: G# o# O4 |2 j/ M
) G6 a$ ~- [4 [) h9 |- V: f; [ ' ^8 l/ D0 B9 x; u/ h2 M6 A
I 《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》
# r% W% u- b3 t, g! t2 k
) S' V+ o2 s1 b+ o# X6 ^* T9 M9 pBackground: This study aimed to evaluate whether inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in human malignant solid tumors.  U1 b! t: E7 e
5 \( H2 k7 z3 q) l  \" p
Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted, from January 2021 to December 2022, in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, and participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the inosine (trial) or non-inosine (control) group that received inosine (dosage: 0.2 g, three times/day) + PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor or only PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor ± targeted ± chemotherapy, respectively. Efficacy was assessed every 6 weeks (i.e., after every two-three treatment cycles). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05809336).& d3 E& D& j, ^
4 Y9 j1 n; l$ T9 `
Results: Among the 172 participants with advanced malignant solid tumors, 86 each were assigned to the inosine and non-inosine groups, wherein the median PFS (95% CI) was 7.00 (5.31-8.69) and 4.40 (3.10-5.70) months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.011), and the ORR was 26.7% and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.061). In the inosine and non-inosine groups, the median OS was not reached and was 29.67 (95% CI 17.40-41.94) months, respectively (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.59-1.84], p = 0.874). Compared with the non-inosine group, the median PFS and ORR of the inosine group were significantly prolonged and improved in the multiple exploratory subgroup analyses. The safety analysis showed that Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25 (29%) and 31 (36%) patients in the inosine and non-inosine groups, respectively, and tended to decrease in the inosine group compared with the non-inosine group.
; I$ C- Q  E( |6 X
- W3 l) U3 g# g' P5 mConclusion: Inosine had a tendency to enhance the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and reduced immunotherapy-related adverse reactions.$ |; r% b( z  |- Z# Y! Y/ I- s# o5 E
4 R: \" f% a. r

7 `2 f+ w# g( p* }. _
& a! L4 w2 o, b* [II 《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》
6 M& j, S2 L+ T: T" p1 }6 u: \% D* v 4 U/ i3 C/ x$ i! }# w, `, w" _
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge has emerged as a prominent study area in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). β-glucan was reported to reverse resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by regulating the tumor microenvironment. In this self-initiated clinical trial (ChiCTR2100054796), NSCLC participants who have previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy received β-glucan (500 mg, bid, d1-21), Envafolimab (300 mg, d1) and Endostar (210 mg, civ72h) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were observed, while serum samples were collected for proteomic analysis./ w! U7 A2 ~6 M' }1 P( M

. U6 O) S% J2 g' X. OResults: Twenty Three patients were enrolled from January 2022 to March 2023 (median age, 65 years; male, n = 18 [78.3%]; squamous NSCLC, n = 9 [39.1%]; mutant type, n = 13 [56.5%]). The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 73.9%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 4.3 months [95% CI: 2.0-6.6] and 9.8 months [95% CI: 7.2-12.4], respectively. The mPFS between PD-L1 positive and negative subgroup has significant difference (6.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 52.2% of patients. The most common TRAEs were hypothyroidism (26.1%) and fatigue (26.1%). 2 (8.7%) grade 3 adverse events were reported. No adverse reaction related deaths have been observed. Proteomic analysis revealed that the levels of CASP-8, ARG1, MMP12, CD28 and CXCL5 correlated with resistance to the treatment while the levels of CD40-L and EGF related to the favorable response.8 @* w7 i/ b, q8 l6 Y9 h8 q

) V* z# I: u; VConclusion: β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar has considerable efficacy and safety for immune rechallenge in metastatic NSCLC patients who failed of anti-PD-1 treatment previously, especially for PD-L1 positive patients.

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 回复
  • 转播
  • 评分
  • 分享
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
微信公号
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表